0

Published on Thu Nov 11 19:21:45 GMT 2010 in the Selkirk Weekend Advertiser

A man who ran a hotel chain, including two in the North West, is fighting his son in court over a £5.1 million divorce settlement he made with his former wife two months before she died.

Fraser Richardson inherited his mother Harriet’s estate and is resisting his father Eric’s application to cut the settlement.

The father ran a hotel chain and flats business with his wife and faces a massive damages claim after a child was injured falling from one of the apartments.

His insurers have warned him they may not indemnify him and he wants the divorce settlement figure varied so that any damages award is shared with the estate of his late wife.

Sally Harrison QC, representing the son, told three judges at the Court of Appeal: “The relationship between Fraser Richardson and his father has broken down entirely and they could not work together in any way in the future.”

The son says that when the divorce settlement was agreed, his father retained 52.5% of the couple’s joint assets, close to £11 million, and in return agreed to take on all the risks of the business from which his mother had retired.

Nigel Dyer QC, representing the 71-year-old father, said any damages award should be a joint liability because the accident happened when his former wife was his business partner. He said it was not foreseeable during the divorce proceedings that the insurers might repudiate liability under the insurance policy and refuse to indemnify the business.

“In these circumstances it is not fair or reasonable that the husband alone should be liable for the damages award; any damages award should still be a liability to be met by the husband and wife’s estate.”

At the time of the divorce settlement hearing, both husband and wife were 70 and had been married for more than 40 years. During their marriage they carried on a business as hoteliers, property investors and landlords. Their assets comprised two hotels in the North West, five in Devon and Cornwall and nine blocks of flats in Manchester, worth a total of £40 million.

The accident in 2004 involved a two-year-old girl who fell from a window in one of the couple’s blocks of flats. Mr Dyer said that three and a half years after the accident, a personal injury claim was issued against Mr Richardson and the Richardson Group which he ran with his wife. Judgment was reserved in the case.

Copyright (c) Press Association Ltd. 2010, All Rights Reserved.

Continue Reading

0

Any disagreement over a will can cause a significant delays, threaten the value of an asset and potentially freeze the inheritance if it’s part of a contentious probate case.

Here are some warnings about the situations which can spark a dispute over a will.

1. Witnesses: The law states that a will must be signed in the presence to two witnesses at the same time. However, the validity of the witness can be called into question if they weren’t present together when the will was signed. I always advise that the witnesses also sign using the same pen.

2. A Testator’s mental state: Can be challenged if it’s suspected that they weren’t capable of understanding what they were doing, or if they were pressured or coerced into making any part of the will.

If it takes a while to obtain probate, it can diminish the value of the estate. If this is a serious risk, the court can authorise the collection and preservation of assets pending the issue of a full grant.

However, just because probate has been granted, it doesn’t mean that there won’t be any further disputes. After probate has been issued, there could be disagreements over the interpretation of the will.

The key thing to take from this advice is that you need to be explicitly clear when writing a will, and consult specialist to help you because if it’s not right, there’ll be problems after you’ve passed.

Continue Reading

0

Malcolm McLaren’s son and girlfriend are in a legal battle over the punk legend’s will made on his deathbed.

According to The Daily Mail – 17th September 2010, the former Sex Pistols’ manager signed everything over to his girlfriend and left nothing of his fortune to his only son Joe Corre.

Mr Corre claims the will is invalid and it’s being investigated by lawyers on both sides of the Atlantic. The contentious probate case hangs on the notion that Mr McLaren didn’t have the mental capacity to make a will. Mr Corre also argues that it is invalid because two witness must be present who are not beneficiaries, which apparently wan’t the case here. However, according to Swiss probate law, the inheritance contract does not require an independent witness – it must only be certified by a public official.

It’s believed Malcolm and Joe have been estranged for many years, but reconciled before Malcolm’s death in Switzerland.

On his death bed, Mr McLaren signed everything including rights to outstanding Sex Pistols monies and his seven figure fortune to girlfriend Young Kim. A friend said: “In the will, Malcolm said that Joe should not be left a penny. Nothing. It all had to go to Young Kim.”

An unnamed source believes Mr Corre is more angered at being snubbed by his father than the fact that he won’t inherit the fortune.

Both parties declined to comment as the dispute continues.

Continue Reading